User Tools

Site Tools


differential_signaling_exercises

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
differential_signaling_exercises [2016/02/25 11:35] mhidalgodifferential_signaling_exercises [2017/05/24 14:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 33: Line 33:
 Run the Differential signaling tool with these files, selecting the options of both functional analysis //Gene ontology// and //Uniprot keywords//. Run the Differential signaling tool with these files, selecting the options of both functional analysis //Gene ontology// and //Uniprot keywords//.
  
-Try to identify representative functions of this experiment (related to the disease). Are there significative functions? Are they related with the disease?+**2.1.-** Try to identify representative functions of this experiment (related to the disease). Are there significative functions? Are they related with the disease
 + 
 +**2.2.-** Look at the Heatmaps provided by the tool for the different analyses. Do you think that a predictor could be trained from these data? With which matrix do you think that it would work better
  
  
Line 45: Line 47:
   * Experimental design: {{:kirc_demo_ED_class.txt|}}   * Experimental design: {{:kirc_demo_ED_class.txt|}}
  
-**3.1.-** Run the Differential signaling tool with these files, selecting also the functional analyses. You can select the option //Color nodes by differentail expression// if desired. Look at the results. If you have done Exercises 1 or 2, can you find any difference in the results of this dataset? +**3.1.-** Run the Differential signaling tool with these files, selecting also the functional analyses. You can select the option //Color nodes by differentail expression// if desired. Find representative paths and functions of this disease.
- +
-**3.2.-** Look at the Heatmaps provided by the tool for the different analyses. Do you think that a predictor could be trained from these data? With which matrix do you think that it would work better?  +
- +
- +
-Stages describe the natural evolution of any cancer. You can find further information on the matter in  +
-[[http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/diagnosis-staging/staging/staging-fact-sheet]]. +
- +
-Now we will try to understand how the Kidney cancer evolves by comparing the initial (I) with the final (IV) stages. We will use a subset of the former matrix, with a new experimental design, that you can download from the following links: +
- +
-  * Expression matrix: {{:kirc_demo_genes_vals_tumor.txt|}} +
-  * Experimental design: {{:kirc_demo_ED_stages.txt|}}+
  
-**3.3.-** Run the Differential signaling tool with the former files comparing stage I versus stage IV. Compare the results with those given in Exercise 3.1. Are there any differences? What do they mean+**3.2.-** Look at the results. If you have done Exercises or 2, can you find any difference in the results of this dataset?
  
-**3.4.-** Look for some paths which are related with disease but not with its progression.  
  
 ==== Exercise 4 ==== ==== Exercise 4 ====
differential_signaling_exercises.1456400109.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/05/24 14:33 (external edit)